Coach Evaluation 2022-23 (St. Marys Minor Hockey)

St Marys Minor Hockey Coaching Evaluation

Survey completed by:^*

Parent
Player
Both

Required

Your Name (optional)

Parent name is optional.

Team Name^*

Required

Coach being evaluated^*

Head Coach
Assistant Coaches
Trainer
Manager
Parent Rep

Check All That Apply

Games

Rate the following questions. Rating Scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = agree; 4 = strongly agree; N/A = Not Applicable

1. The number of games played (exhibition, regular season, tournament, playoffs) by the team was sufficient and reasonable for this age level^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

2. The Coach came prepared and organized^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

3. The Coach provided fair ice time considering various abilities of players, game situations and the importance of balancing winning games and developing players^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

4. The Coach used Affiliated Players (AP) fairly and according to the official SMMHA AP Guideline taking into consideration team needs and player development^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

5. The Coach kept winning in perspective^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

Please use the text area below for constructive comments to further explain above ratings.

Practices

Rate the following questions. Rating Scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = agree; 4 = strongly agree; N/A = Not Applicable

6. The number of practices by the team was sufficient and reasonable for this age level^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

7. The Coach ran organized practices, made good use of practice time, and engaged all players^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

8. Practices involved drills appropriate for the age and skill level^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

9. Players received feedback as part of their development^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

10. Player hockey skills improved^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

Please use the text area below for constructive comments to further explain above ratings.

Overall

Rate the following questions. Rating Scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = agree; 4 = strongly agree; N/A = Not Applicable

11. The Coach communicated effectively with players and parents, was available and willing to listen and speak about any issue or concern^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

12. The Coach reviewed the coaching philosophy and team/player expectations with all players and parents prior to the start of the season and followed the philosophy/approach all season^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

13. The Coach exhibited professional behavior at all times both on and off the ice and was a good role model for the players ^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

14. The coaching staff exhibited professional behavior at all times both on and off the ice and were good role models for the players^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

15. The Coach had an appropriate amount of knowledge of the skills and tactics of hockey for this team and was a good instructor and motivator^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

16. Discipline on the team was handled fairly and appropriately by the Coach throughout the season^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

17. The team progressed over the course of the season^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

18. I would want the Coach to coach my child again (or me if completed by player)^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

19. Overall, the season was a positive experience^*

1
2
3
4
N/A

Required

Please use the text area below for constructive comments to further explain above ratings.

Human Validation Failed, Please Try Again

Coach Evaluation 2022-23 (St. Marys Minor Hockey)

OMHA Digital Network

St Marys Minor Hockey Coaching Evaluation

Games

Practices

Overall

Get Mobile!

Contact Us